Skip to content
Glow & Current

Head to head

NuFACE TRINITY+ vs ZIIP Halo

The only two devices in this category that publish a current figure, and they publish different kinds of figure because they disagree about what the variable is.

By Selena H. · Published October 13, 2026

A pair of hands working across the jawline - an illustrative image for the microcurrent section

Illustrative photograph, not a picture of a specific device.

Disclosure: Glow & Current earns a commission when you buy through links on this page, at no extra cost to you. It does not change which device wins or what we say about it — here is exactly how we are funded, and here is how we evaluate devices.

The core disagreement

Two different theories of what matters

NuFACE's position is essentially about amplitude and technique: a defined microamp range, a skin sensor that adjusts it, attachments shaped for different areas, and a manual pass pattern you learn. The number they publish is a ceiling.

ZIIP's position is that the shape of the waveform matters as much as its size. The Halo runs from 900 nanoamps - three orders of magnitude below the microcurrent ceiling - up to 400 microamps, across up to 23 combinations pushed from an app. The number they publish is a range.

Neither position is settled by published evidence, and we are not going to pretend one is. What we can say is that both brands publish a figure, which puts them ahead of FOREO and Medicube before any argument about whose theory is right.

Specifications

Specifications side by side

NuFACE TRINITY+ZIIP Halo
Published currentUp to 340 microamps, +25 Boost900 nA to 400 microamps
Waveform varietyNot published as a variableUp to 23 combinations
ControlOn-device, plus skin sensorApp-driven
Flagship routineManual pass patternTHE LIFT, 4 minutes
AttachmentsThree, sold separatelyNone; single body
Warranty2 yearsNot published
510(k) for this modelK201782Not located
Brand's other clearancesK181008, K191672, K240564, K212947K161484, K212342
Manufacturer and FDA figures, checked 13 October 2026.

Quick picks

The short answer

#ProductBest forFDA clearancePrice
1
A pair of hands working across the jawline - an illustrative image for the microcurrent section. Illustrative only - not a photograph of this model.

NuFACE TRINITY+

Wins on regulatory record

a device with a clearance naming the modelLocated
2
A pair of hands working across the jawline - an illustrative image for the microcurrent section. Illustrative only - not a photograph of this model.

ZIIP Halo

Wins on treatment variety

varying the treatment to the dayNot located

Prices are checked live and stamped with the date they were read. No live price is held for these listings right now, so every button reads “Check price on Amazon” rather than showing a number we cannot stand behind. Last price check: October 13, 2026.

Regulation

The clearance gap

NuFACE has eight located clearances in product code NFO going back to 2007, including K201782 naming the Trinity Plus device specifically. That is the deepest regulatory history of any brand on this site.

ZIIP holds two: K161484 for the original ZIIP Device (February 2017) and K212342 for the ZIIP+ (September 2021). We searched for a record naming the Halo and found none. The brand is clearly familiar with the process, so the Halo is either covered by an existing record under a different name, or sold without one.

This is a genuine point against the Halo, and it is the main reason NuFACE edges this comparison for a buyer who weights verifiability. If a ZIIP clearance for the Halo exists, tell us.

Living with it

App dependency is a real trade-off

The Halo is substantially less useful without the ZIIP app and an account. Treatments are pushed to the device; the waveform library is the product. If you like that, it is the most interesting device in this category. If you do not want another account and another app, it is a dependency rather than a feature.

The NuFACE has an app too, but the device works without it. That difference matters more over five years than it does in the first week.

Time

Four minutes versus a learned routine

ZIIP's flagship routine, THE LIFT, runs four minutes. NuFACE's protocol is a learned pass pattern typically taking five to ten minutes depending on coverage.

Four minutes is a real adherence advantage, and in a category defined by abandonment that counts for a lot. Against that, the NuFACE pattern is yours once you have learned it and does not require opening an app first.

In detail

Every pick, and why

A pair of hands working across the jawline - an illustrative image for the microcurrent section. Illustrative only - not a photograph of this model.

Illustrative photograph. Not a picture of this model.

Wins on regulatory record

NuFACE TRINITY+

NuFACE · Best for a device with a clearance naming the model

K201782 for the device and K212947 for the LED attachment, plus up to 340 microamps published and a two-year warranty. The deepest clearance history in the category, back to 2007.

The reference microcurrent device: swappable attachments, an app, a published microamp ceiling and the deepest clearance history in the category.

Specifications

OutputUp to 340 microamps; the Boost button adds 25 microamps
AttachmentsFacial Trainer, Effective Lip and Eye, Wrinkle Reducer (red LED)
Protocol5 times a week for 60 days, then 2-3 times a week
Warranty2 years
ClearanceK201782 device, K212947 Wrinkle Reducer attachment

FDA clearance located

510(k) K201782 (NuFace Trinity Plus Device, cleared 22 January 2021, product code NFO - over-the-counter powered facial toning). The Wrinkle Reducer attachment carries its own clearance, K212947 (2 April 2022, product code OHS).

What works

  • Publishes its actual microamp output, which most of this category refuses to do
  • Two located clearances, one for the device and one for the LED attachment
  • Two-year warranty is the longest here

What does not

  • Attachments are sold separately and add up fast
  • Needs conductive gel every session, which is a running cost
  • The app is a convenience, not a reason to buy

Specifications from NuFACE product page; FDA 510(k) K201782 and K212947, checked 13 October 2026.

A pair of hands working across the jawline - an illustrative image for the microcurrent section. Illustrative only - not a photograph of this model.

Illustrative photograph. Not a picture of this model.

Wins on treatment variety

ZIIP Halo

ZIIP Beauty · Best for varying the treatment to the day

900 nanoamps to 400 microamps across up to 23 waveform combinations, with a four-minute flagship routine. No clearance located for the Halo itself; ZIIP's records are K161484 and K212342 for earlier devices.

The app-driven device that runs nanocurrent as well as microcurrent, with a published current range that spans three orders of magnitude.

Specifications

Output900 nA to 400 microamps across up to 23 waveform combinations
Flagship routineTHE LIFT, 4 minutes
ControlTreatments are pushed from the ZIIP app
ClearanceNone located for the Halo; see K161484 and K212342 for the brand

FDA clearance not located

No 510(k) record located for the Halo specifically. ZIIP's cleared devices on file are the ZIIP Device (K161484, 24 February 2017) and ZIIP+ (K212342, 23 September 2021), both product code NFO.

What works

  • Publishes an actual current range, including the nanocurrent floor
  • The only device here that treats waveform shape as the variable
  • Four-minute flagship routine is realistically repeatable

What does not

  • No located clearance for this model
  • The device is useless without the app and an account
  • Conductive gel is proprietary and a continuing cost

Specifications from ZIIP Halo retail specification; FDA 510(k) database query, checked 13 October 2026.

The decision

Who should buy which

  • NuFACE TRINITY+ if you want a clearance naming the model, a two-year warranty, attachments for different areas, or a device that works without an app.
  • ZIIP Halo if the four-minute routine is what will keep you consistent, if you want variety in the treatment, or if you find the waveform argument persuasive.
  • NuFACE MINI+ if this is your first device and you are not sure yet. That comparison is here.

FAQ

Questions people actually ask

Is ZIIP better than NuFACE?
They publish different kinds of figure because they disagree about what matters: NuFACE publishes an amplitude ceiling of up to 340 microamps, ZIIP a range from 900 nanoamps to 400 microamps across 23 waveform combinations. NuFACE has the stronger clearance record; ZIIP has the more varied treatment library.
Is the ZIIP Halo FDA cleared?
We could not locate a 510(k) record naming the Halo specifically. ZIIP holds K161484 for the original ZIIP Device and K212342 for the ZIIP+, both under product code NFO.
Do you need the ZIIP app?
Effectively yes. Treatments are pushed to the device from the app and the waveform library is the product. The NuFACE has an app but works without it.
What is nanocurrent?
Current measured in nanoamps rather than microamps - a thousand times smaller. ZIIP's published range runs from 900 nanoamps up to 400 microamps, and its argument is that very low currents do something different rather than simply less.

Sources

Where this page’s facts come from

Read next