Device review
ZIIP Halo review
The most interesting device in this category and the one with the biggest dependency. Its argument is that waveform shape matters as much as amplitude, and it is the only brand making that argument in public.
By Selena H. · Published October 13, 2026

Illustrative photograph, not a picture of a specific device.
Quick picks
The short answer
| # | Product | Best for | FDA clearance | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() ZIIP Halo Best for treatment variety | people who want to vary the session | Not located |
Prices are checked live and stamped with the date they were read. No live price is held for these listings right now, so every button reads “Check price on Amazon” rather than showing a number we cannot stand behind. Last price check: October 13, 2026.
Specification
What you get
A handheld device running dual-waveform technology: nanocurrent and microcurrent, with each treatment carrying a defined waveform and intensity. The published range is 900 nanoamps to 400 microamps, across up to 23 unique combinations. Treatments are selected and pushed from the ZIIP app. The flagship routine, THE LIFT, is a four-minute free-form session. Conductor gel is supplied.
Output
The range, and why it is a different kind of disclosure
NuFACE publishes a ceiling: up to 340 microamps. ZIIP publishes a range with a floor three orders of magnitude lower: 900 nanoamps at the bottom, 400 microamps at the top.
That difference is the whole ZIIP argument. If the only variable were amplitude, a floor of 900 nanoamps would be pointless - it is effectively nothing. ZIIP's position is that very low currents in particular waveform patterns do something qualitatively different rather than simply less, which is why the device is built around a library rather than a dial.
Is that true? We do not know, and neither does anyone publishing on this topic that we could find. The microcurrent literature is thinner than the photobiomodulation literature, and the nanocurrent subset of it thinner still. What we can say is that ZIIP has made a falsifiable claim in public, which is more than FOREO or Medicube have done.
Regulation
The clearance gap
ZIIP holds K161484 for the ZIIP Device, cleared 24 February 2017, and K212342 for the ZIIP+ Device, cleared 23 September 2021, both under product code NFO.
We searched for a record naming the Halo specifically and found none. The brand clearly knows how to obtain a clearance, having done so twice, so the Halo is either covered by one of the existing records under a different name or sold without one.
Living with it
The app dependency
The Halo without the app is a device with very limited function. The treatment library is the product, and accessing it requires an account.
For some people that is the appeal: a different routine for a different day, guided, with no need to learn a pass pattern. For others it is a dependency on a company continuing to run a service, on a phone being charged, and on an app that will be rewritten at some point. Both reactions are reasonable, and you should know which one is yours before you buy.
Adherence
Four minutes is the underrated feature
THE LIFT runs four minutes. A NuFACE pass is typically five to ten depending on coverage. In the most-abandoned device category in home skincare, four minutes is a meaningful advantage and we would weight it more heavily than the waveform argument.
Limits
What it will not do
- No attachments. One body, one geometry. For precise periorbital work, NuFACE's FIX+ or the Lip and Eye attachment is the better tool.
- No published warranty that we could find.
- Nothing for skin quality. Texture and tone are LED territory.
- Nothing permanent. Same as everything in this category.
In detail
Every pick, and why
Best for treatment variety
ZIIP Halo
ZIIP Beauty · Best for people who want to vary the session
900 nanoamps to 400 microamps across up to 23 waveform combinations, with THE LIFT at four minutes. No clearance located for the Halo itself - ZIIP's records are K161484 and K212342 for earlier devices - and the device is substantially less useful without the app.
The app-driven device that runs nanocurrent as well as microcurrent, with a published current range that spans three orders of magnitude.
Specifications
| Output | 900 nA to 400 microamps across up to 23 waveform combinations |
|---|---|
| Flagship routine | THE LIFT, 4 minutes |
| Control | Treatments are pushed from the ZIIP app |
| Clearance | None located for the Halo; see K161484 and K212342 for the brand |
FDA clearance not located
No 510(k) record located for the Halo specifically. ZIIP's cleared devices on file are the ZIIP Device (K161484, 24 February 2017) and ZIIP+ (K212342, 23 September 2021), both product code NFO.
What works
- Publishes an actual current range, including the nanocurrent floor
- The only device here that treats waveform shape as the variable
- Four-minute flagship routine is realistically repeatable
What does not
- No located clearance for this model
- The device is useless without the app and an account
- Conductive gel is proprietary and a continuing cost
Specifications from ZIIP Halo retail specification; FDA 510(k) database query, checked 13 October 2026.
Honest counter-case
Who should skip it
- Anyone who wants a clearance naming the device. NuFACE's K201782 does.
- Anyone who does not want another app and account.
- Anyone with an implanted electrical device. Hard contraindication, as with every microcurrent device.
- Anyone who wants attachments for specific areas. One body, one geometry.
FAQ
Questions people actually ask
Is the ZIIP Halo FDA cleared?
What is nanocurrent and is it different from microcurrent?
Do you need the ZIIP app?
How long is a ZIIP Halo treatment?
Sources
Where this page’s facts come from
Read next
Keep going
- NuFACE TRINITY+ vs ZIIP Halo
A published amplitude ceiling against a published range with 23 waveforms, and the clearance gap between them.
- The best microcurrent devices, ranked by what they will tell you
Microcurrent devices ranked on published microamp output, located FDA clearances and the protocol each one demands.
- How microcurrent actually works
The mechanism explained: what microamps do, why the lift is immediate, and where the published evidence stops.
- Microcurrent for under-eye bags, and why the cause decides the device
Which under-eye causes respond to microcurrent, which respond to cooling, and which respond to neither.
- Microcurrent conductive gel: what it has to be, and what it does not
Why gel is non-negotiable, what properties it needs, which substitutes work and which actively do not.
