ZIIP GX vs ZIIP Halo

Disclosure: Glow & Current earns a commission when you buy through links on this page, at no extra cost to you. It does not change which device wins or what we say about it — here is exactly how we are funded, and here is how we evaluate devices.

Buy the ZIIP GX if you want ZIIP's treatment library at the lowest price: it runs the same app and the same routines as the Halo, with a larger contact area, and it is usually discounted. Buy the Halo if you want the model that publishes an actual current range, 900 nA to 400 microamps, and that will stay in the lineup longest. Neither device holds a 510(k) record we could match to its name, which is the single most important sentence on this page.

Quick picks

The short answer

#	Product	Best for	FDA clearance	Price
1	ZIIP Halo Wins on published specification	buyers who want a number on the page	Not located	Check price on Amazon #ad How we are funded
2	ZIIP GX Wins on value	the same treatments for less money	Not located	Check price on Amazon #ad How we are funded
3	NuFACE TRINITY+ The alternative with the paperwork	anyone who wants a clearance naming the device	Located	Check price on Amazon #ad How we are funded

Prices are checked live and stamped with the date they were read. No live price is held for these listings right now, so every button reads “Check price on Amazon” rather than showing a number we cannot stand behind. Last price check: October 13, 2026.

ZIIP's argument is that the shape of the waveform matters as much as its amplitude, and that nanocurrent - current a thousand times smaller than microcurrent - does something distinct. That is a genuine position rather than marketing noise, and the Halo's published floor of 900 nanoamps is the only figure in this category that even addresses it.

What does not exist is a published comparison showing a nanocurrent routine outperforming a microcurrent one on the same face. Treat waveform variety as a feature you may value, not as a demonstrated advantage. How microcurrent is proposed to work, and what the literature supports.

In detail

Every pick, and why

Illustrative photograph. Not a picture of this model.

Check price on Amazon

#ad How we are funded

Wins on published specification

ZIIP Halo

ZIIP Beauty · Best for buyers who want a number on the page

900 nA to 400 microamps across up to 23 waveform combinations, with a four-minute flagship routine called THE LIFT. The current model, so it is the one that stays supported. No clearance located for the Halo itself.

The app-driven device that runs nanocurrent as well as microcurrent, with a published current range that spans three orders of magnitude.

Specifications

Output	900 nA to 400 microamps across up to 23 waveform combinations
Flagship routine	THE LIFT, 4 minutes
Control	Treatments are pushed from the ZIIP app
Clearance	None located for the Halo; see K161484 and K212342 for the brand

FDA clearance not located

No 510(k) record located for the Halo specifically. ZIIP's cleared devices on file are the ZIIP Device (K161484, 24 February 2017) and ZIIP+ (K212342, 23 September 2021), both product code NFO.

What works

• Publishes an actual current range, including the nanocurrent floor
• The only device here that treats waveform shape as the variable
• Four-minute flagship routine is realistically repeatable

What does not

• No located clearance for this model
• The device is useless without the app and an account
• Conductive gel is proprietary and a continuing cost

Specifications from ZIIP Halo retail specification; FDA 510(k) database query, checked 13 October 2026.

Illustrative photograph. Not a picture of this model.

Check price on Amazon

#ad How we are funded

Wins on value

ZIIP GX

ZIIP Beauty · Best for the same treatments for less money

Same app, same treatment library, larger contact area, and routinely discounted below the Halo. ZIIP does not publish a GX-specific current range, and we could not match the GX name to a 510(k) record.

The older full-size ZIIP, still sold, with the same app-driven waveform approach.

Specifications

Output	Nanocurrent and microcurrent; ZIIP does not publish a GX-specific range
Control	ZIIP app

FDA clearance not located

ZIIP's cleared devices on file are the ZIIP Device (K161484) and ZIIP+ (K212342). We could not match the GX name to a specific record.

What works

• Same treatment library as the Halo
• Often discounted below the Halo
• Larger contact area than the Halo

What does not

• Superseded in the lineup
• No model-specific published current range
• No clearance record we could match to the name

Specifications from FDA 510(k) database query, applicant ZIIP, 13 October 2026, checked 13 October 2026.

Illustrative photograph. Not a picture of this model.

Check price on Amazon

#ad How we are funded

The alternative with the paperwork

NuFACE TRINITY+

NuFACE · Best for anyone who wants a clearance naming the device

K201782 names the device and K212947 names the LED attachment, with up to 340 microamps published and a two-year warranty. No app subscription, no account, and the deepest clearance history in the category.

The reference microcurrent device: swappable attachments, an app, a published microamp ceiling and the deepest clearance history in the category.

Specifications

Output	Up to 340 microamps; the Boost button adds 25 microamps
Attachments	Facial Trainer, Effective Lip and Eye, Wrinkle Reducer (red LED)
Protocol	5 times a week for 60 days, then 2-3 times a week
Warranty	2 years
Clearance	K201782 device, K212947 Wrinkle Reducer attachment

FDA clearance located

510(k) K201782 (NuFace Trinity Plus Device, cleared 22 January 2021, product code NFO - over-the-counter powered facial toning). The Wrinkle Reducer attachment carries its own clearance, K212947 (2 April 2022, product code OHS).

What works

• Publishes its actual microamp output, which most of this category refuses to do
• Two located clearances, one for the device and one for the LED attachment
• Two-year warranty is the longest here

What does not

• Attachments are sold separately and add up fast
• Needs conductive gel every session, which is a running cost
• The app is a convenience, not a reason to buy

Specifications from NuFACE product page; FDA 510(k) K201782 and K212947, checked 13 October 2026.

Both devices are inert without the ZIIP app and an account. The treatment library is the reason people buy ZIIP, and it is also the reason both devices are tied to a company continuing to publish routines. A NuFACE works the same way in ten years with no account at all; a ZIIP depends on the app surviving.

That dependency cuts in the GX's favor on value. If the app is the product and both devices run the same library, paying the Halo premium buys a published number, a smaller body and a longer support horizon rather than a different treatment.

• GX if the treatment library is why you are here and the discount is real.
• Halo if you want the current model, the contoured body and the only published current range ZIIP offers. The Halo on its own terms.
• Neither if a located clearance for the exact device is non-negotiable - that points to NuFACE, compared with ZIIP directly.