Skip to content
Glow & Current

Roundup

The best microcurrent devices, ranked by what they will tell you

One brand in this category publishes its microamp output. One publishes a current range. Two publish nothing at all and sell on mode counts instead. That is most of the ranking.

By Selena H. · Published October 13, 2026

A pair of hands working across the jawline - an illustrative image for the microcurrent section

Illustrative photograph, not a picture of a specific device.

Disclosure: Glow & Current earns a commission when you buy through links on this page, at no extra cost to you. It does not change which device wins or what we say about it — here is exactly how we are funded, and here is how we evaluate devices.

Microcurrent is the category where one brand decided to publish its output and the rest decided to compete on mode counts. That single difference shapes this entire ranking.

Method

How this ranking was built

We did not test these devices. We read what each manufacturer publishes and searched the FDA's public 510(k) database device by device. Devices rank higher for publishing an output figure you can hold them to and for holding a clearance record that names the specific model. They rank lower for asking you to accept a claim with nothing attached to it.

Quick picks

The short answer

#ProductBest forFDA clearancePrice
1
A pair of hands working across the jawline - an illustrative image for the microcurrent section. Illustrative only - not a photograph of this model.

NuFACE TRINITY+

Best overall

most people, most facesLocated
2
A pair of hands working across the jawline - an illustrative image for the microcurrent section. Illustrative only - not a photograph of this model.

ZIIP Halo

Best for waveform control

people who want to vary the treatmentNot located
3
A pair of hands working across the jawline - an illustrative image for the microcurrent section. Illustrative only - not a photograph of this model.

NuFACE MINI+

Best entry point

a first microcurrent deviceLocated
4
A pair of hands working across the jawline - an illustrative image for the microcurrent section. Illustrative only - not a photograph of this model.

7E Wellness MyoLift Mini

Best manual control

anyone who wants esthetician-style techniqueNot located
5
A pair of hands working across the jawline - an illustrative image for the microcurrent section. Illustrative only - not a photograph of this model.

FOREO BEAR 2

Easiest to live with

hygiene and low effortNot located
6
A pair of hands working across the jawline - an illustrative image for the microcurrent section. Illustrative only - not a photograph of this model.

Medicube AGE-R Booster Pro

Most modalities

wanting more than microcurrentNot located

Prices are checked live and stamped with the date they were read. No live price is held for these listings right now, so every button reads “Check price on Amazon” rather than showing a number we cannot stand behind. Last price check: October 13, 2026.

The number that matters

The output table

DevicePublished output510(k) locatedProtocol
NuFACE TRINITY+Up to 340 microamps, +25 with BoostK201782 (22 Jan 2021), plus K212947 for the LED attachment5x a week for 60 days, then 2-3x
ZIIP Halo900 nA to 400 microamps, 23 waveform combinationsNot for the Halo; K161484 and K212342 for earlier ZIIP devicesTHE LIFT is 4 minutes
NuFACE MINI+Not published separatelyK191672 (15 Oct 2019)Same as the flagship
MyoLift MiniManual adjustment; no ceiling publishedK213078 covers the MyoLift QTManual, technique-led
FOREO BEAR 2Not publishedK200803 covers BEAR and BEAR miniApp-guided
Medicube AGE-R Booster ProNot published; 6 intensity levelsNone locatedVaries by mode
Manufacturer and FDA figures, checked 13 October 2026. Two of six devices publish a current figure. Mode counts and intensity levels are not output.

Read that first column carefully. Six intensity levels is not a specification - it tells you a device has six positions on a dial, not what any of them delivers. Up to 340 microamps is a specification. The difference is whether the manufacturer can be shown to be wrong.

Regulation

What the clearances show

Microcurrent facial devices sit under FDA product code NFO: over-the-counter powered facial toning. NuFACE's record in this code goes back to 2007 and runs to eight separate clearances, which is the deepest regulatory history in any category on this site.

One detail worth knowing: the NuFACE Trinity+ Wrinkle Reducer attachment, which adds red LED, holds its own clearance, K212947, under the wrinkle-reduction code OHS rather than NFO. A manufacturer filing separately for an accessory is doing the thing correctly, and it is worth noting when so much of this market does not.

Medicube returns nothing. We searched by brand and by the AGE-R device names and found no record at all. That does not make the device unsafe, and plenty of cosmetic devices are sold legally without one - but against a device with two clearances and a published output, it is asking for more trust than it has earned.

Before you buy

The running costs nobody mentions

  • Conductive gel, every session. Microcurrent needs a conductive medium or it does nothing. Budget for it like razor blades. What actually has to be in it.
  • Attachments, on the NuFACE. The TRINITY+ is a handle. The Facial Trainer, the Lip and Eye attachment and the Wrinkle Reducer are separate purchases, and the full set costs more than the device.
  • Time, indefinitely. Five sessions a week for sixty days, then two or three a week forever. The realistic timeline.
  • An app and an account, on the ZIIP and FOREO. Both devices are substantially less useful without them, which is a dependency rather than a feature.

In detail

Every pick, and why

A pair of hands working across the jawline - an illustrative image for the microcurrent section. Illustrative only - not a photograph of this model.

Illustrative photograph. Not a picture of this model.

No. 1 · Best overall

NuFACE TRINITY+

NuFACE · Best for most people, most faces

The only device here that publishes a microamp ceiling you can hold it to: up to 340 microamps, plus 25 from the Boost button. Two located clearances, K201782 for the device and K212947 for the Wrinkle Reducer attachment, and a two-year warranty. The attachments add up, and that is the main criticism.

The reference microcurrent device: swappable attachments, an app, a published microamp ceiling and the deepest clearance history in the category.

Specifications

OutputUp to 340 microamps; the Boost button adds 25 microamps
AttachmentsFacial Trainer, Effective Lip and Eye, Wrinkle Reducer (red LED)
Protocol5 times a week for 60 days, then 2-3 times a week
Warranty2 years
ClearanceK201782 device, K212947 Wrinkle Reducer attachment

FDA clearance located

510(k) K201782 (NuFace Trinity Plus Device, cleared 22 January 2021, product code NFO - over-the-counter powered facial toning). The Wrinkle Reducer attachment carries its own clearance, K212947 (2 April 2022, product code OHS).

What works

  • Publishes its actual microamp output, which most of this category refuses to do
  • Two located clearances, one for the device and one for the LED attachment
  • Two-year warranty is the longest here

What does not

  • Attachments are sold separately and add up fast
  • Needs conductive gel every session, which is a running cost
  • The app is a convenience, not a reason to buy

Specifications from NuFACE product page; FDA 510(k) K201782 and K212947, checked 13 October 2026.

A pair of hands working across the jawline - an illustrative image for the microcurrent section. Illustrative only - not a photograph of this model.

Illustrative photograph. Not a picture of this model.

No. 2 · Best for waveform control

ZIIP Halo

ZIIP Beauty · Best for people who want to vary the treatment

Publishes a range rather than a ceiling - 900 nanoamps to 400 microamps across up to 23 waveform combinations - which is a more informative claim than a single number. No clearance located for the Halo specifically; ZIIP's records are K161484 and K212342 for earlier devices.

The app-driven device that runs nanocurrent as well as microcurrent, with a published current range that spans three orders of magnitude.

Specifications

Output900 nA to 400 microamps across up to 23 waveform combinations
Flagship routineTHE LIFT, 4 minutes
ControlTreatments are pushed from the ZIIP app
ClearanceNone located for the Halo; see K161484 and K212342 for the brand

FDA clearance not located

No 510(k) record located for the Halo specifically. ZIIP's cleared devices on file are the ZIIP Device (K161484, 24 February 2017) and ZIIP+ (K212342, 23 September 2021), both product code NFO.

What works

  • Publishes an actual current range, including the nanocurrent floor
  • The only device here that treats waveform shape as the variable
  • Four-minute flagship routine is realistically repeatable

What does not

  • No located clearance for this model
  • The device is useless without the app and an account
  • Conductive gel is proprietary and a continuing cost

Specifications from ZIIP Halo retail specification; FDA 510(k) database query, checked 13 October 2026.

A pair of hands working across the jawline - an illustrative image for the microcurrent section. Illustrative only - not a photograph of this model.

Illustrative photograph. Not a picture of this model.

No. 3 · Best entry point

NuFACE MINI+

NuFACE · Best for a first microcurrent device

K191672, the same product code as the flagship, in a body small enough that people actually keep using it. No attachment system and NuFACE does not publish a comparable output figure, so you are buying the brand's protocol in a smaller package.

The compact NuFACE: the same microcurrent family in a smaller body with fixed spheres and no attachment system.

Specifications

AttachmentsFixed spheres; no interchangeable heads
Protocol5 times a week for 60 days, then 2-3 times a week
ClearanceK191672, 15 October 2019, product code NFO
OutputLower ceiling than the TRINITY+; NuFACE does not publish a directly comparable figure

FDA clearance located

510(k) K191672 (NuFACE Mini Device, cleared 15 October 2019, applicant Carol Cole Company dba NuFACE, product code NFO).

What works

  • A located clearance in the same product code as the flagship
  • Travel size, and the one people actually keep using
  • Much lower entry cost than the TRINITY+

What does not

  • No attachment system, so no eye and lip head and no red-light head
  • Lower output ceiling and NuFACE does not publish the number
  • Smaller spheres mean a longer session to cover the same face

Specifications from FDA 510(k) K191672; NuFACE product listing, checked 13 October 2026.

A pair of hands working across the jawline - an illustrative image for the microcurrent section. Illustrative only - not a photograph of this model.

Illustrative photograph. Not a picture of this model.

No. 4 · Best manual control

7E Wellness MyoLift Mini

7E Wellness · Best for anyone who wants esthetician-style technique

Twin probes and manual microamp adjustment rather than presets. The MyoLift QT in the same family holds K213078. It punishes sloppy technique and rewards learning properly, which is a narrower proposition than the others here.

A professional-lineage true microcurrent device with manual current control rather than preset routines.

Specifications

ControlManual microamp adjustment rather than fixed presets
ProbesTwin handheld probes, esthetician-style technique
ClearanceK213078 covers the MyoLift QT; no separate Mini record located

FDA clearance not located

The MyoLift QT carries 510(k) K213078 (27 April 2023, applicant Johari Digital Healthcare Limited, product code NFO). We could not locate a separate record for the Mini.

What works

  • Manual current control is the closest a home device gets to professional technique
  • The family has a located clearance in the right product code
  • Twin probes let you work one muscle at a time

What does not

  • Steep learning curve, and it punishes sloppy technique
  • No separate located clearance for the Mini
  • Needs cotton tips and solution, not just gel

Specifications from FDA 510(k) K213078, checked 13 October 2026.

A pair of hands working across the jawline - an illustrative image for the microcurrent section. Illustrative only - not a photograph of this model.

Illustrative photograph. Not a picture of this model.

No. 5 · Easiest to live with

FOREO BEAR 2

FOREO · Best for hygiene and low effort

A sealed silicone body you can rinse under a tap, which no other device here can claim. FOREO publishes no microamp figure at all, and we could not locate a clearance for the BEAR 2 face model specifically - K200803 covers BEAR and BEAR mini.

A silicone-bodied microcurrent device with a sensor that claims to detect and throttle current by skin area.

Specifications

OutputFOREO does not publish a microamp figure
BodySealed silicone, fully washable
ClearanceK200803 covers BEAR and BEAR mini; no separate BEAR 2 face record located

FDA clearance not located

FOREO's located clearances cover BEAR and BEAR mini (K200803, 31 July 2020, product code NFO) and BEAR 2 Body (K232242, 13 May 2024). We could not locate a separate record for the face BEAR 2.

What works

  • Sealed silicone body is the easiest device here to keep clean
  • The brand does hold a located clearance in this product code
  • Works with its own gel or a generic conductive gel

What does not

  • No published microamp output at all, so it cannot be compared on the one number that matters
  • No located clearance for the BEAR 2 face model specifically
  • Heavily app-dependent

Specifications from FDA 510(k) database query, applicant FOREO, 13 October 2026, checked 13 October 2026.

A pair of hands working across the jawline - an illustrative image for the microcurrent section. Illustrative only - not a photograph of this model.

Illustrative photograph. Not a picture of this model.

No. 6 · Most modalities

Medicube AGE-R Booster Pro

Medicube · Best for wanting more than microcurrent

Seven modes including electroporation, which nothing else here offers. No located FDA clearance for any AGE-R device and no published microamp figure, so the microcurrent is one feature among several rather than a specification you can evaluate.

A seven-mode multi-modality device that bundles electroporation, microcurrent, EMS, electric needles, LED and sonic vibration into one dual-head body.

Specifications

Modes7, including Booster (electroporation), MC, Derma Shot, Air Shot, Mask and AI
Intensity levels6
HeadDual head
PowerDC 5V / 2A USB-C, 3.7 V 2,600 mAh battery
ClearanceNone located

FDA clearance not located

No 510(k) record located under the Medicube brand or the AGE-R device names in the public FDA database.

What works

  • Genuinely does several jobs, and the electroporation mode has no equivalent in the NuFACE or ZIIP lines
  • Published electrical specifications, which is unusual at this price
  • Dual head covers ground quickly

What does not

  • No located FDA clearance for any AGE-R device
  • No published microamp figure, so it cannot be compared to NuFACE on output
  • Seven modes means the microcurrent is one feature among many, not the focus

Specifications from Medicube retail specification; FDA 510(k) database query, 13 October 2026, checked 13 October 2026.

The honest counter-case

Who should not buy any of these

  • Anyone with an implanted electrical device, including a pacemaker. This is a hard contraindication across every manufacturer. Full contraindications.
  • Anyone who will not do the protocol. Five sessions a week for sixty days is the entry requirement. Four sessions total gets you a party trick and a drawer ornament.
  • Anyone whose complaint is texture rather than contour. That is an LED question, not a microcurrent one.
  • Anyone whose complaint is genuine laxity. Microcurrent works on muscle tone. Radiofrequency addresses the dermis.

FAQ

Questions people actually ask

Which microcurrent device is best?
The NuFACE TRINITY+, on verifiable specifications: it publishes an output ceiling of up to 340 microamps, holds two located clearances (K201782 and K212947 for the LED attachment) and carries a two-year warranty. The ZIIP Halo is the better choice if you want variable waveforms rather than a single intensity curve.
Which microcurrent device has the highest output?
Of the devices that publish a figure, NuFACE states up to 340 microamps for the TRINITY+ with 25 more from the Boost button, and ZIIP states a range up to 400 microamps for the Halo. FOREO and Medicube publish no microamp figure at all, so a complete ranking is impossible.
Is a cheaper microcurrent device worth buying?
The NuFACE MINI+ holds a located clearance in the same product code as the flagship and is the device people most often keep using, because it is small. What you give up is the attachment system and any published output figure.
Do microcurrent devices need special gel?
They need a conductive medium; for most devices any water-based conductive gel works. App-driven systems calibrated to their own gel are the exception. Running a device on dry skin does nothing and feels unpleasant.
Is Medicube AGE-R FDA cleared?
We searched the public 510(k) database by brand and by the AGE-R device names on 13 October 2026 and found no record. Absence does not prove none exists, but the claim cannot be verified by a buyer.

Sources

Where this page’s facts come from

Read next