Head to head
NuFACE TRINITY+ vs Medicube AGE-R Booster Pro
One device does microcurrent and publishes what it delivers. The other does seven things and publishes none of them. That is the comparison, and it is less close than the feature lists suggest.
By Selena H. · Published October 13, 2026

Illustrative photograph, not a picture of a specific device.
Disclosure: Glow & Current earns a commission when you buy through links on this page, at no extra cost to you. It does not change which device wins or what we say about it — here is exactly how we are funded, and here is how we evaluate devices.
Specifications
Specifications side by side
| NuFACE TRINITY+ | Medicube AGE-R Booster Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Modalities | Microcurrent; red LED via attachment | Electroporation, microcurrent, EMS, electric needles, LED, sonic vibration |
| Modes | Intensity levels on one modality | 7 modes, 6 intensity levels |
| Published output | Up to 340 microamps, +25 Boost | Not published |
| Head | Twin spheres, interchangeable | Dual head, fixed |
| Published electrical specs | Not published beyond output | DC 5V / 2A USB-C, 3.7 V 2,600 mAh |
| Warranty | 2 years | Not published |
| 510(k) located | K201782, K212947 | None |
Quick picks
The short answer
| # | Product | Best for | FDA clearance | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() NuFACE TRINITY+ The one we would buy | anyone who wants microcurrent specifically | Located | |
| 2 | ![]() Medicube AGE-R Booster Pro More modes, less information | someone who specifically wants electroporation | Not located |
Prices are checked live and stamped with the date they were read. No live price is held for these listings right now, so every button reads “Check price on Amazon” rather than showing a number we cannot stand behind. Last price check: October 13, 2026.
The core problem
Seven modes, no output figure
Medicube publishes the battery capacity and the charging voltage. It does not publish the microamp output of its microcurrent mode, the energy of its EMS mode, or the field strength of its electroporation mode.
That is an odd set of priorities: the specifications that tell you about charging are published, and the specifications that tell you what the device does to your face are not. Six intensity levels means the dial has six positions. It does not tell you what position six delivers, or how it compares to NuFACE's 340 microamps.
We cannot rank these two devices on output because only one of them has published an output. That is the whole finding.
Regulation
The clearance situation
We searched the FDA 510(k) database by the Medicube brand and by the AGE-R device names and found no record at all. NuFACE has eight.
We want to state this fairly. Plenty of cosmetic devices are sold legally in the US without a 510(k), and an absent record is not proof of an absent clearance. But when one device in a comparison has a clearance naming the exact model and the other returns nothing, that is a real asymmetry in what a buyer can verify.
The genuine differentiator
What electroporation actually is
Electroporation applies brief electrical pulses to transiently increase cell membrane permeability, with the aim of helping topical actives penetrate further than they otherwise would. It is a real technique with a real basis, used in clinical settings.
Whether a consumer device at an unpublished field strength achieves meaningful penetration enhancement is exactly the same unanswerable question we keep running into. But NuFACE does not offer this modality at all, so if you specifically want it, the Medicube is the device that has it. That is a legitimate reason to choose it, made with your eyes open.
Doing several things
The multi-tool problem
A device that does seven things has made seven engineering compromises. Microcurrent is one feature among several rather than the thing the device was designed around, and the dual head is a fixed geometry rather than a set of attachments shaped for different areas.
Against that, seven modes in one body is genuinely convenient and costs less than buying several specialized devices. The honest framing is breadth against depth, and which one is right depends on whether you have one problem or several.
In detail
Every pick, and why
The one we would buy
NuFACE TRINITY+
NuFACE · Best for anyone who wants microcurrent specifically
Up to 340 microamps published, clearances K201782 and K212947, two-year warranty, eight clearances across the brand since 2007. It does one thing and tells you what it does.
The reference microcurrent device: swappable attachments, an app, a published microamp ceiling and the deepest clearance history in the category.
Specifications
| Output | Up to 340 microamps; the Boost button adds 25 microamps |
|---|---|
| Attachments | Facial Trainer, Effective Lip and Eye, Wrinkle Reducer (red LED) |
| Protocol | 5 times a week for 60 days, then 2-3 times a week |
| Warranty | 2 years |
| Clearance | K201782 device, K212947 Wrinkle Reducer attachment |
FDA clearance located
510(k) K201782 (NuFace Trinity Plus Device, cleared 22 January 2021, product code NFO - over-the-counter powered facial toning). The Wrinkle Reducer attachment carries its own clearance, K212947 (2 April 2022, product code OHS).
What works
- Publishes its actual microamp output, which most of this category refuses to do
- Two located clearances, one for the device and one for the LED attachment
- Two-year warranty is the longest here
What does not
- Attachments are sold separately and add up fast
- Needs conductive gel every session, which is a running cost
- The app is a convenience, not a reason to buy
Specifications from NuFACE product page; FDA 510(k) K201782 and K212947, checked 13 October 2026.
More modes, less information
Medicube AGE-R Booster Pro
Medicube · Best for someone who specifically wants electroporation
Seven modes including electroporation, which nothing else here offers, dual head, six intensity levels and published electrical specifications. No FDA clearance located for any AGE-R device, and no microamp figure published at all.
A seven-mode multi-modality device that bundles electroporation, microcurrent, EMS, electric needles, LED and sonic vibration into one dual-head body.
Specifications
| Modes | 7, including Booster (electroporation), MC, Derma Shot, Air Shot, Mask and AI |
|---|---|
| Intensity levels | 6 |
| Head | Dual head |
| Power | DC 5V / 2A USB-C, 3.7 V 2,600 mAh battery |
| Clearance | None located |
FDA clearance not located
No 510(k) record located under the Medicube brand or the AGE-R device names in the public FDA database.
What works
- Genuinely does several jobs, and the electroporation mode has no equivalent in the NuFACE or ZIIP lines
- Published electrical specifications, which is unusual at this price
- Dual head covers ground quickly
What does not
- No located FDA clearance for any AGE-R device
- No published microamp figure, so it cannot be compared to NuFACE on output
- Seven modes means the microcurrent is one feature among many, not the focus
Specifications from Medicube retail specification; FDA 510(k) database query, 13 October 2026, checked 13 October 2026.
The decision
Who should buy which
- NuFACE TRINITY+ if microcurrent is what you want, if a published output matters, or if you want a clearance you can look up.
- Medicube AGE-R Booster Pro if electroporation is specifically the thing you are after, or if you want several modalities in one body and accept that none of them publishes an output.
- Neither if you want the strongest evidence base in this category - that is NuFACE's clearance history, and the Medicube does not compete on it.
FAQ
Questions people actually ask
Is Medicube AGE-R better than NuFACE?
Is Medicube AGE-R FDA cleared?
What is electroporation and does NuFACE have it?
Are seven modes better than one?
Sources
Where this page’s facts come from
Read next
Keep going
- Medicube AGE-R Booster Pro review
A seven-mode multi-modality device with genuine electroporation, no published output figures and no located FDA clearance.
- NuFACE TRINITY+ review
A published 340 microamp ceiling, two located clearances and a two-year warranty - with attachments sold separately.
- Medicube AGE-R Booster Pro vs Booster Pro X2
Two generations of the AGE-R Booster Pro compared, including everything neither of them publishes.
- The best microcurrent devices, ranked by what they will tell you
Microcurrent devices ranked on published microamp output, located FDA clearances and the protocol each one demands.
- How microcurrent actually works
The mechanism explained: what microamps do, why the lift is immediate, and where the published evidence stops.

