Skip to content
Glow & Current

Head to head

NuFACE TRINITY+ vs Medicube AGE-R Booster Pro

One device does microcurrent and publishes what it delivers. The other does seven things and publishes none of them. That is the comparison, and it is less close than the feature lists suggest.

By Selena H. · Published October 13, 2026

A pair of hands working across the jawline - an illustrative image for the microcurrent section

Illustrative photograph, not a picture of a specific device.

Disclosure: Glow & Current earns a commission when you buy through links on this page, at no extra cost to you. It does not change which device wins or what we say about it — here is exactly how we are funded, and here is how we evaluate devices.

Specifications

Specifications side by side

NuFACE TRINITY+Medicube AGE-R Booster Pro
ModalitiesMicrocurrent; red LED via attachmentElectroporation, microcurrent, EMS, electric needles, LED, sonic vibration
ModesIntensity levels on one modality7 modes, 6 intensity levels
Published outputUp to 340 microamps, +25 BoostNot published
HeadTwin spheres, interchangeableDual head, fixed
Published electrical specsNot published beyond outputDC 5V / 2A USB-C, 3.7 V 2,600 mAh
Warranty2 yearsNot published
510(k) locatedK201782, K212947None
Manufacturer and FDA figures, checked 13 October 2026.

Quick picks

The short answer

#ProductBest forFDA clearancePrice
1
A pair of hands working across the jawline - an illustrative image for the microcurrent section. Illustrative only - not a photograph of this model.

NuFACE TRINITY+

The one we would buy

anyone who wants microcurrent specificallyLocated
2
A pair of hands working across the jawline - an illustrative image for the microcurrent section. Illustrative only - not a photograph of this model.

Medicube AGE-R Booster Pro

More modes, less information

someone who specifically wants electroporationNot located

Prices are checked live and stamped with the date they were read. No live price is held for these listings right now, so every button reads “Check price on Amazon” rather than showing a number we cannot stand behind. Last price check: October 13, 2026.

The core problem

Seven modes, no output figure

Medicube publishes the battery capacity and the charging voltage. It does not publish the microamp output of its microcurrent mode, the energy of its EMS mode, or the field strength of its electroporation mode.

That is an odd set of priorities: the specifications that tell you about charging are published, and the specifications that tell you what the device does to your face are not. Six intensity levels means the dial has six positions. It does not tell you what position six delivers, or how it compares to NuFACE's 340 microamps.

We cannot rank these two devices on output because only one of them has published an output. That is the whole finding.

Regulation

The clearance situation

We searched the FDA 510(k) database by the Medicube brand and by the AGE-R device names and found no record at all. NuFACE has eight.

We want to state this fairly. Plenty of cosmetic devices are sold legally in the US without a 510(k), and an absent record is not proof of an absent clearance. But when one device in a comparison has a clearance naming the exact model and the other returns nothing, that is a real asymmetry in what a buyer can verify.

The genuine differentiator

What electroporation actually is

Electroporation applies brief electrical pulses to transiently increase cell membrane permeability, with the aim of helping topical actives penetrate further than they otherwise would. It is a real technique with a real basis, used in clinical settings.

Whether a consumer device at an unpublished field strength achieves meaningful penetration enhancement is exactly the same unanswerable question we keep running into. But NuFACE does not offer this modality at all, so if you specifically want it, the Medicube is the device that has it. That is a legitimate reason to choose it, made with your eyes open.

Doing several things

The multi-tool problem

A device that does seven things has made seven engineering compromises. Microcurrent is one feature among several rather than the thing the device was designed around, and the dual head is a fixed geometry rather than a set of attachments shaped for different areas.

Against that, seven modes in one body is genuinely convenient and costs less than buying several specialized devices. The honest framing is breadth against depth, and which one is right depends on whether you have one problem or several.

In detail

Every pick, and why

A pair of hands working across the jawline - an illustrative image for the microcurrent section. Illustrative only - not a photograph of this model.

Illustrative photograph. Not a picture of this model.

The one we would buy

NuFACE TRINITY+

NuFACE · Best for anyone who wants microcurrent specifically

Up to 340 microamps published, clearances K201782 and K212947, two-year warranty, eight clearances across the brand since 2007. It does one thing and tells you what it does.

The reference microcurrent device: swappable attachments, an app, a published microamp ceiling and the deepest clearance history in the category.

Specifications

OutputUp to 340 microamps; the Boost button adds 25 microamps
AttachmentsFacial Trainer, Effective Lip and Eye, Wrinkle Reducer (red LED)
Protocol5 times a week for 60 days, then 2-3 times a week
Warranty2 years
ClearanceK201782 device, K212947 Wrinkle Reducer attachment

FDA clearance located

510(k) K201782 (NuFace Trinity Plus Device, cleared 22 January 2021, product code NFO - over-the-counter powered facial toning). The Wrinkle Reducer attachment carries its own clearance, K212947 (2 April 2022, product code OHS).

What works

  • Publishes its actual microamp output, which most of this category refuses to do
  • Two located clearances, one for the device and one for the LED attachment
  • Two-year warranty is the longest here

What does not

  • Attachments are sold separately and add up fast
  • Needs conductive gel every session, which is a running cost
  • The app is a convenience, not a reason to buy

Specifications from NuFACE product page; FDA 510(k) K201782 and K212947, checked 13 October 2026.

A pair of hands working across the jawline - an illustrative image for the microcurrent section. Illustrative only - not a photograph of this model.

Illustrative photograph. Not a picture of this model.

More modes, less information

Medicube AGE-R Booster Pro

Medicube · Best for someone who specifically wants electroporation

Seven modes including electroporation, which nothing else here offers, dual head, six intensity levels and published electrical specifications. No FDA clearance located for any AGE-R device, and no microamp figure published at all.

A seven-mode multi-modality device that bundles electroporation, microcurrent, EMS, electric needles, LED and sonic vibration into one dual-head body.

Specifications

Modes7, including Booster (electroporation), MC, Derma Shot, Air Shot, Mask and AI
Intensity levels6
HeadDual head
PowerDC 5V / 2A USB-C, 3.7 V 2,600 mAh battery
ClearanceNone located

FDA clearance not located

No 510(k) record located under the Medicube brand or the AGE-R device names in the public FDA database.

What works

  • Genuinely does several jobs, and the electroporation mode has no equivalent in the NuFACE or ZIIP lines
  • Published electrical specifications, which is unusual at this price
  • Dual head covers ground quickly

What does not

  • No located FDA clearance for any AGE-R device
  • No published microamp figure, so it cannot be compared to NuFACE on output
  • Seven modes means the microcurrent is one feature among many, not the focus

Specifications from Medicube retail specification; FDA 510(k) database query, 13 October 2026, checked 13 October 2026.

The decision

Who should buy which

  • NuFACE TRINITY+ if microcurrent is what you want, if a published output matters, or if you want a clearance you can look up.
  • Medicube AGE-R Booster Pro if electroporation is specifically the thing you are after, or if you want several modalities in one body and accept that none of them publishes an output.
  • Neither if you want the strongest evidence base in this category - that is NuFACE's clearance history, and the Medicube does not compete on it.

FAQ

Questions people actually ask

Is Medicube AGE-R better than NuFACE?
It does more things; it tells you less about any of them. NuFACE publishes an output of up to 340 microamps and holds eight FDA clearances. Medicube publishes no output figure for any mode and we could not locate any clearance. For microcurrent specifically, NuFACE is the better-documented purchase.
Is Medicube AGE-R FDA cleared?
We searched the public 510(k) database by brand and by the AGE-R device names on 13 October 2026 and found no record. Absence does not prove none exists, but the claim cannot be verified by a buyer.
What is electroporation and does NuFACE have it?
Electroporation uses brief electrical pulses to transiently increase cell membrane permeability so topical actives penetrate further. NuFACE does not offer it. It is the Medicube's genuine differentiator, though the field strength is not published.
Are seven modes better than one?
Not automatically. A device built around seven modalities has made compromises on each, and in this case none of them publishes an output figure. Breadth against depth, and the right answer depends on whether you have one problem or several.

Sources

Where this page’s facts come from

Read next