Head to head
Ulike Air 10 vs Ulike Air 3
The within-brand upgrade question, answered honestly: one of these publishes an energy figure that leads the category, and the other is covered by the same cooling idea for a lot less money.
By Selena H. · Published October 17, 2026

Illustrative photograph, not a picture of a specific device.
Disclosure: Glow & Current earns a commission when you buy through links on this page, at no extra cost to you. It does not change which device wins or what we say about it — here is exactly how we are funded, and here is how we evaluate devices.
Buy the Ulike Air 10 if your hair is coarse or you want the course over with: 23.6 J/cm2 is the highest brand-stated energy density of any mainstream home handset, and ten intensity steps let you work up to it. Buy the Air 3 if your hair is fine to medium and the price gap matters - it keeps the sapphire contact cooling that makes Ulike worth buying at all, and it sits under a located clearance of its own. The upgrade is real, but it is an upgrade in sessions, not in whether the thing works.
Specifications
What Ulike publishes for each
| Ulike Air 10 | Ulike Air 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Published energy | 23.6 J/cm2, brand-stated | Lower; no directly comparable figure published for every variant |
| Flashes | 1,000,000 | Not published consistently across variants |
| Intensity levels | 10 | Fewer |
| Cooling | Sapphire contact cooling, near 16-18 C | Sapphire contact cooling |
| 510(k) | K241998 (UI20, 13 Dec 2024), K250942 (UI20S, 11 Jul 2025) | K233887 (22 Jan 2024), covering UI06, UI07, UI08 and UI20 families |
| Position in lineup | Current flagship | Previous generation, still widely sold |
Quick picks
The short answer
| # | Product | Best for | FDA clearance | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() Ulike Air 10 Wins on specification | coarse hair and the fewest sessions | Located | |
| 2 | ![]() Ulike Air 3 Wins on value | fine-to-medium hair on a budget | Located | |
| 3 | ![]() Braun Silk-expert Pro 5 The alternative philosophy | automatic intensity and the best sensor | Located |
Prices are checked live and stamped with the date they were read. No live price is held for these listings right now, so every button reads “Check price on Amazon” rather than showing a number we cannot stand behind. Last price check: October 13, 2026.
The numbers
Why the energy figure matters, and how much
Energy density governs how much is delivered to the follicle in a single pulse. More energy per pulse generally means fewer sessions to the same reduction, which is why the Air 10's figure is the headline specification in this category. It is also brand-stated and not independently verified, like every energy figure on every handset we checked.
What higher energy does not do is change the skin-tone ceiling or make light hair respond. Those limits are set by the mechanism, not the specification. What a joule figure tells you, and what it does not.
In detail
Every pick, and why
Wins on specification
Ulike Air 10
Ulike · Best for coarse hair and the fewest sessions
23.6 J/cm2 brand-stated, 1,000,000 flashes, 10 intensity levels and sapphire cooling held near 16-18 C. Clearances K241998 for the UI20 family and K250942 for the UI20S variants.
The highest published energy density of the mainstream home IPL handsets, paired with sapphire contact cooling.
Specifications
| Energy | 23.6 J/cm2, brand-stated |
|---|---|
| Flashes | 1,000,000 |
| Intensity levels | 10 |
| Cooling | Sapphire contact cooling held near 16-18 C |
| Clearance | K241998 (UI20), K250942 (UI20S), product code OHT |
FDA clearance located
Ulike's UI20 family is covered by 510(k) K241998 (Ice Cooling IPL Hair Removal Device, cleared 13 December 2024, product code OHT - light-based over-the-counter hair removal), with the UI20S variants cleared under K250942 (11 July 2025).
What works
- Located, current clearances for the exact model family
- Highest brand-stated energy density here by a clear margin
- Contact cooling makes high energy levels tolerable, which is the whole point of high energy
What does not
- Energy density is brand-stated and not independently verified
- Like every IPL handset, it is unsuitable at the darkest end of the Fitzpatrick scale
- Larger window is awkward on the upper lip
Specifications from Ulike product documentation; FDA 510(k) K241998 and K250942, checked 13 October 2026.
Wins on value
Ulike Air 3
Ulike · Best for fine-to-medium hair on a budget
The same sapphire contact cooling at the cheapest price in the cooled-handset class, covered by clearance K233887. Lower energy and fewer intensity steps, and Ulike does not publish a directly comparable figure for every variant.
The previous-generation Ulike, still widely sold and much cheaper than the Air 10.
Specifications
| Cooling | Sapphire contact cooling |
|---|---|
| Energy | Lower than the Air 10; Ulike does not publish a directly comparable figure for every variant |
| Clearance | K233887, 22 January 2024, product code OHT |
FDA clearance located
Covered by the Ulike IPL clearances on file, 510(k) K233887 (22 January 2024, product code OHT), which lists the UI06, UI07, UI08 and UI20 model families.
What works
- Covered by a located clearance
- Same cooling approach as the flagship
- Routinely the cheapest cooled IPL handset
What does not
- Lower energy means more sessions for the same result
- Fewer intensity steps than the Air 10
- Published specs are less consistent across variants
Specifications from FDA 510(k) K233887, checked 13 October 2026.
The alternative philosophy
Braun Silk-expert Pro 5
Braun · Best for automatic intensity and the best sensor
K190354, up to 6 J/cm2, and a SkinPro 2.0 sensor reading skin tone 80 times a second at up to 125 flashes a minute. Lower energy by design, with the safety engineering to match.
The sensor-led handset: it reads skin tone 80 times a second and sets the intensity for you, which is a different design philosophy to maximizing energy.
Specifications
| Energy | Up to 6 J/cm2, brand-stated |
|---|---|
| Flashes | 400,000 |
| Intensity levels | 10, set automatically by SensoAdapt |
| Sensor | SkinPro 2.0 reads skin tone 80 times a second |
| Speed | Up to 125 flashes a minute; both legs in under 5 minutes |
| Clearance | K190354, 18 March 2019, product code OHT |
FDA clearance located
510(k) K190354 (BRAUN Silk.expert Pro 5, cleared 18 March 2019, applicant Cyden Limited, product code OHT).
What works
- A located clearance with a named applicant and date
- The continuous skin-tone sensor is the best safety implementation in the category
- Fastest glide mode here
What does not
- 6 J/cm2 is a quarter of the Ulike figure, so expect more sessions
- Automatic intensity removes the control some users want
- Corded operation on several variants
Specifications from Braun product page; FDA 510(k) K190354, checked 13 October 2026.
Hardware
Cooling is the feature that makes both usable
Sapphire contact cooling is the reason Ulike handsets tolerate high settings. Cold glass against skin blunts the sting of the pulse, which sounds like comfort and is really about compliance: a setting you can bear is a setting you will use, and an unused high setting delivers nothing.
Both generations have it, and that is the strongest argument for the Air 3. You are not giving up the brand's defining feature when you buy the older model - you are giving up intensity steps and energy headroom.
The decision
Who should buy which
- Air 10 for coarse or dense hair, for the bikini line, or if you want the shortest realistic course. The full Air 10 review.
- Air 3 for fine-to-medium leg and underarm hair where the extra energy buys you less than the price difference costs.
- Braun Pro 5 instead if you would rather the device decided the intensity. Ulike against Braun, head to head.
- Neither if your hair is light blonde, red, white or gray - no IPL handset works on it. Why.
The practical difference
What the generation gap costs you in sessions
Neither Ulike nor anyone else publishes a session-count comparison between the two, so the honest framing is directional rather than numerical: lower energy per pulse generally means working through the same follicle population over a longer run of weekly sessions. On fine leg hair that difference is small. On coarse hair it is the whole argument for the Air 10.
The schedule is the same either way - weekly during the course, then maintenance - and that schedule is where most courses fail rather than at the specification. How often you can treat, and the gaps that are not negotiable.
One more practical note: the larger window on the flagship covers legs faster but is harder to place accurately on an upper lip. If the face is a significant part of your plan, a handset with a dedicated face attachment may serve you better than either Ulike. Facial IPL covered properly.
FAQ
Questions people actually ask
What is the difference between the Ulike Air 10 and the Air 3?
Is the Ulike Air 10 worth the upgrade over the Air 3?
Are both Ulike devices FDA cleared?
Does the Ulike Air 3 hurt more than the Air 10?
Sources
Where this page’s facts come from
Read next
Keep going
- Ulike Air 10 review
23.6 J/cm2 brand-stated, sapphire cooling near 16-18 C, a million flashes and two located clearances.
- Ulike vs Braun: the two design philosophies in home IPL
Brand-level comparison of the two dominant approaches: energy plus cooling against sensor-enforced low energy.
- Ulike Air 10 vs Braun Silk-expert Pro 5
The flagship model-vs-model: energy, cooling, flash rate, sensors and clearance records, with a clear recommendation.
- The best at-home IPL devices, and the safety spec to read first
Home IPL handsets ranked on published energy density, skin-tone sensing and located FDA clearance records.
- IPL joules explained: reading the energy figure properly
What J/cm2 measures, what it omits, how spectrum and pulse duration change the picture, and why higher is not always better.
- Philips Lumea IPL 9900 vs Braun Silk-expert Pro 5
Area-specific attachments against continuous skin-tone sensing - the two best-documented IPL handsets, compared on records and published times.
