Device review
FOREO BEAR 2 review
FOREO solved the problem that makes people abandon microcurrent devices, and then declined to tell you what the device delivers. Both of those are worth knowing.
By Selena H. · Published October 13, 2026

Illustrative photograph, not a picture of a specific device.
Quick picks
The short answer
| # | Product | Best for | FDA clearance | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ![]() FOREO BEAR 2 Easiest microcurrent device to maintain | anyone who abandons devices because of upkeep | Not located |
Prices are checked live and stamped with the date they were read. No live price is held for these listings right now, so every button reads “Check price on Amazon” rather than showing a number we cannot stand behind. Last price check: October 13, 2026.
Specification
What you get
A handheld microcurrent device in a fully sealed silicone body, app-led, with a sensor FOREO says detects and adjusts to the area being treated. It works with FOREO's own gel or a generic conductive gel.
That is most of what can be said with confidence, because the rest is not published.
Why it matters
The sealed body is a genuine engineering answer
Think about what a microcurrent device goes through. Conductive gel, every session, several times a week, for years. Every other device in this category has seams, metal contacts, an attachment mechanism and a charging port, and you are wiping gel out of all of them.
The BEAR 2 goes under a tap. No seams to trap gel, nothing to corrode, no attachment mechanism to work loose. For a category where the dominant failure mode is abandonment, removing a weekly friction point is a legitimate design achievement rather than a marketing line.
Output
The number that is not there
FOREO publishes no microamp figure for the BEAR line. Not a ceiling, not a range, not a comparison to anything.
In microcurrent, the current is not a specification alongside others - it is the mechanism. NuFACE publishes up to 340 microamps. ZIIP publishes 900 nanoamps to 400 microamps. MyoLift exposes manual control so the operator sets it. FOREO publishes a sensor and an app.
We cannot tell you whether the BEAR 2 delivers more or less than a NuFACE, because the comparison requires a number that does not exist. That is not a criticism of how the device performs; it is a statement about what can be known about it.
Regulation
The clearance detail
FOREO holds K200803, covering BEAR and BEAR mini, cleared 31 July 2020 under product code NFO, and K232242 for BEAR 2 Body, cleared 13 May 2024. We could not locate a separate record naming the BEAR 2 face device.
FOREO is clearly operating properly within the category - a genuine clearance history in the right product code, including a recent one. It is just not a record naming the device on the shelf, which is what NuFACE's K201782 gives a buyer.
Living with it
App dependency
The BEAR 2 is heavily app-led, with guided routines and the sensor behavior surfaced through the phone. Like the ZIIP, that is either the appeal or the drawback depending on who you are. Unlike the ZIIP, FOREO's hardware is more usable standalone.
Limits
What it will not do
- No attachments. One geometry for the whole face, including the orbital area.
- No published output, as covered above.
- Nothing for skin quality. LED territory.
- Nothing permanent. Stop and it fades, as everywhere in this category.
In detail
Every pick, and why
Easiest microcurrent device to maintain
FOREO BEAR 2
FOREO · Best for anyone who abandons devices because of upkeep
A fully sealed silicone body that rinses under a tap, which nothing else here can claim. No microamp figure published at all, and K200803 covers BEAR and BEAR mini rather than the BEAR 2 face model specifically.
A silicone-bodied microcurrent device with a sensor that claims to detect and throttle current by skin area.
Specifications
| Output | FOREO does not publish a microamp figure |
|---|---|
| Body | Sealed silicone, fully washable |
| Clearance | K200803 covers BEAR and BEAR mini; no separate BEAR 2 face record located |
FDA clearance not located
FOREO's located clearances cover BEAR and BEAR mini (K200803, 31 July 2020, product code NFO) and BEAR 2 Body (K232242, 13 May 2024). We could not locate a separate record for the face BEAR 2.
What works
- Sealed silicone body is the easiest device here to keep clean
- The brand does hold a located clearance in this product code
- Works with its own gel or a generic conductive gel
What does not
- No published microamp output at all, so it cannot be compared on the one number that matters
- No located clearance for the BEAR 2 face model specifically
- Heavily app-dependent
Specifications from FDA 510(k) database query, applicant FOREO, 13 October 2026, checked 13 October 2026.
Honest counter-case
Who should skip it
- Anyone who wants to know the output. NuFACE publishes it.
- Anyone who wants a clearance naming the model.
- Anyone who wants area-specific attachments.
- Anyone with an implanted electrical device. Hard contraindication, as with all microcurrent.
FAQ
Questions people actually ask
Is the FOREO BEAR 2 FDA cleared?
What is the FOREO BEAR 2's output?
Can you wash the FOREO BEAR 2?
Does the FOREO BEAR 2 need FOREO's own gel?
Sources
Where this page’s facts come from
Read next
Keep going
- FOREO BEAR 2 vs NuFACE TRINITY+
A sealed washable silicone body against a published output figure and a deep clearance history.
- The best microcurrent devices, ranked by what they will tell you
Microcurrent devices ranked on published microamp output, located FDA clearances and the protocol each one demands.
- Microcurrent conductive gel: what it has to be, and what it does not
Why gel is non-negotiable, what properties it needs, which substitutes work and which actively do not.
- NuFACE TRINITY+ vs ZIIP Halo
A published amplitude ceiling against a published range with 23 waveforms, and the clearance gap between them.
- How microcurrent actually works
The mechanism explained: what microamps do, why the lift is immediate, and where the published evidence stops.
